Let \(E, F \subseteq \Omega\) such that \(P(F) > 0\). Then the conditional probability that \(E\) occurs given that \(F\) has occurred is
\[ P(E \mid F) = \frac{P(E \cap F)}{P(F)} \quad \text{for } P(F) > 0. \]\(P(E \mid F)\) is also known as the probability of \(E\) given \(F\).
- \(P(E \cap F) = P(E \mid F)P(F)\).
- In the uniform outcome case: \[ P(E \mid F) = \frac{P(E \cap F)}{P(F)} = \frac{\frac{|E \cap F|}{|\Omega|}}{\frac{|F|}{|\Omega|}} = \frac{|E \cap F|}{|F|} \]
- \begin{align*} P(E_{1} \cap E_{2} \cap E_{3}) &= P(E_{1} \mid E_{2} \cap E_{3})P(E_{2} \cap E_{3}) \\ &= P(E_{1} \mid E_{2} \cap E_{3})P(E_{2} \mid E_{3})P(E_{3}). \end{align*}
Let \(E_{1},\dots,E_{n} \subseteq \Omega\) such that \(\bigcup_{i=1}^{n} E_{i} = \Omega\) and \(E_{i} \cap E_{j} = \emptyset\) for \(i \neq j\).
Let \(E \subseteq \Omega\). Then
Proof: Note \(E = \bigcup_{i=1}^{n} (E \cap E_{i})\).
\begin{align*} \implies P(E) &= \sum_{i=1}^{n} P(E \cap E_{i}) \\ &= \sum_{i=1}^{n} P(E \mid E_{i}) P(E_{i}). \end{align*}Proof:
\[ P(E_{j} \mid E) = \frac{P(E \cap E_{j})}{P(E)} = \frac{P(E \mid E_{j})P(E_{j})}{\sum_{i=1}^{n} P(E \mid E_{i})P(E_{i})}. \]Roll a die: \(F = \text{the event that an even number occurs}\), \(E = \{1,2,3\}\).
Then
(Since \(F = \{2,4,6\}\), \(E \cap F = \{2\} \implies |F|=3, |E \cap F|=1\)).
A family has two children. What is the conditional probability that both are boys given that at least one of them is a boy?
Solution:
\(\Omega = \{(b,b), (b,g), (g,b), (g,g)\}\).
\(E = \text{both are boys} = \{(b,b)\}\).
\(F = \text{at least one child is a boy} = \{(b,b), (b,g), (g,b)\}\).
(\(n\) rooms are allocated to \(n\) persons).
\(E_{1}^{c} = \text{the room \#1 is not occupied by the first person}\).
\(E_{2} = \text{the second person gets the room \#1}\).
Find \(P(E_{2} \mid E_{1}^{c})\), \(P(E_{2})\).
Solution:
\(\Omega = \{(w_{1},\dots,w_{n}) \mid w_{i} \in [n], w_i \neq w_j\}\).
\(|\Omega| = n!\)
\(E_{1}^{c} = \{(w_{1},\dots,w_{n}) \in \Omega \mid w_{1} \neq 1\} \implies |E_{1}^{c}| = (n-1) \times (n-1)!\)
\(E_{2} = \{(w_{1},\dots,w_{n}) \in \Omega \mid w_{2} = 1\} \implies |E_{2}| = (n-1)!\)
As \(E_{2} \subseteq E_{1}^{c}\), \(E_{2} \cap E_{1}^{c} = E_{2}\).
Now, using total probability (or multiplication rule):
\begin{align*} P(E_{2}) &= P(E_{2} \mid E_{1}^{c})P(E_{1}^{c}) + P(E_{2} \mid E_{1})P(E_{1}) \\ &= \frac{1}{n-1} \times \frac{n-1}{n} + 0 = \frac{1}{n} \end{align*}(Since \(P(E_{2} \mid E_{1}) = 0\)).
A deck of 52 playing cards, containing all 4 kings, is randomly divided into 4 sets of 13 cards each. Define:
\(E_{i} = \text{the } i\text{-th set has exactly one king for } i = 1,2,3,4\).
Find \(P(E_{1} \cap E_{2} \cap E_{3} \cap E_{4})\).
Solution:
From Remark we have:
Now,
\[ P(E_{4}) = \frac{\binom{4}{1}\binom{48}{12}}{\binom{52}{13}}. \] \[ P(E_{3} \mid E_{4}) = \frac{\binom{3}{1}\binom{36}{12}}{\binom{39}{13}}. \] \[ P(E_{2} \mid E_{3}E_{4}) = \frac{\binom{2}{1}\binom{24}{12}}{\binom{26}{13}}. \] \[ P(E_{1} \mid E_{2}E_{3}E_{4}) = \frac{\binom{1}{1}\binom{12}{12}}{\binom{13}{13}} = 1. \]Therefore,
\[ P(E_{1} \cap E_{2} \cap E_{3} \cap E_{4}) = \frac{4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1 \times \binom{48}{12}\binom{36}{12}\binom{24}{12}\binom{12}{12}}{\binom{52}{13}\binom{39}{13}\binom{26}{13}\binom{13}{13}}. \]Consider two urns. The first urn contains seven Red and three black balls and the second contains two red and five black balls. We flip a fair coin and then draw a ball from the first urn or the second urn depending on whether the outcome was heads or tails.
- (i) Find the conditional probability that a Red ball was chosen given Head occurs.
- (ii) Find the probability that a red ball was chosen.
- (iii) Find the conditional probability that heads occurs given that a red ball was chosen.
Solution:
Let \(E_{H} = \text{the event that heads occur}\).
\(E_{T} = \text{the event that tails occur}\).
\(E_{R} = \text{the event that a Red ball was chosen}\).
(i)
\[ P(E_{R} \mid E_{H}) = \frac{7}{10} \](Since Urn 1 has 7 Red out of 10 total).
(ii)
\begin{align*} P(E_{R}) &= P(E_{R} \cap E_{H}) + P(E_{R} \cap E_{T}) \\ &= P(E_{R} \mid E_{H})P(E_{H}) + P(E_{R} \mid E_{T})P(E_{T}) \\ &= \left(\frac{7}{10} \times \frac{1}{2}\right) + \left(\frac{2}{7} \times \frac{1}{2}\right) \\ &= \frac{7}{20} + \frac{1}{7} = \frac{49+20}{140} = \frac{69}{140}. \end{align*}(iii) Using Bayes Formula:
\begin{align*} P(E_{H} \mid E_{R}) &= \frac{P(E_{R} \mid E_{H})P(E_{H})}{P(E_{R})} \\ &= \frac{\frac{7}{10} \times \frac{1}{2}}{\frac{69}{140}} = \frac{\frac{7}{20}}{\frac{69}{140}} \\ &= \frac{7}{20} \times \frac{140}{69} = \frac{49}{69}. \end{align*}Suppose we are participating in a game show. Given the choice of three doors, behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You are asked to pick a door, say you choose No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 2, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to switch to door No. 3?" Does the probability of winning the car change if we switch our choice? Why?
Solution:
Suppose your 1st choice is Door 1 (D1).
\(A = \text{event that the car is behind the door \#1}\).
\(B = \text{event that host opens the door \#2}\).
\(P(A \mid B) = ?\)
\(A^c = \text{car is not behind door \#1 (so it's behind D2 or D3)}\).
A goat is behind door \#2 (D2) and \(P(A^c \mid B) = ?\)
\(\Omega = \{(D1,D2), (D1,D3), (D2,D3), (D3,D2)\}\).
Here, \(\omega = (\omega_{1},\omega_{2}) \in \Omega\)
\(\omega_{1}\) denotes the position of the car.
\(\omega_{2}\) denotes the door that Host opens.
Your 1st choice is D1.
| Position of the car | Host open | Probability |
|---|---|---|
| D1 | D2 | 1/6 |
| D3 | 1/6 | |
| D2 | D3 | 1/3 |
| D3 | D2 | 1/3 |
Suppose there are \(n\) types of coupons and that each coupon collected is with replacement. Suppose \(k\) coupons are to be collected. If \(A_i\) is the event that there is at least one type \(i\) coupon among those collected. Then find:
- (a) \(P(A_{1})\)
- (b) \(P(A_{1} \cup A_{2})\)
- (c) \(P(A_{1} \mid A_{2})\)
Solution:
\(E_l = \text{event that coupon type 1 is collected in } l\text{-th trial}\).
(a)
\begin{align*} P(A_{1}) &= 1 - P(A_{1}^c) \\ &= 1 - P\left(\bigcap_{l=1}^{k} E_{l}^c\right) \\ &= 1 - \left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)^k. \end{align*}Because \(\left|\bigcap_{l=1}^{k} E_{l}^c\right| = (n-1)^k\) and \(|\Omega| = n^k\), so \(P\left(\bigcap_{l=1}^{k} E_{l}^c\right) = \left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)^k\).
(b)
\begin{align*} P(A_{1} \cup A_{2}) &= 1 - P(\text{neither type 1 nor type 2 coupons are collected}) \\ &= 1 - \left(1-\frac{2}{n}\right)^k \quad \text{(Similar to a)} \end{align*}(c)
\[ P(A_{1} \mid A_{2}) = \frac{P(A_{1} \cap A_{2})}{P(A_{2})}. \]We have, \(P(A_{1} \cup A_{2}) = P(A_{1}) + P(A_{2}) - P(A_{1} \cap A_{2})\).
\[ 1 - \left(1-\frac{2}{n}\right)^k = \left[1 - \left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)^k\right] + \left[1 - \left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)^k\right] - P(A_{1} \cap A_{2}) \]Thus,
\[ P(A_{1} \cap A_{2}) = 1 - 2\left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)^k + \left(1-\frac{2}{n}\right)^k \] \[ P(A_{1} \mid A_{2}) = \frac{1 - 2\left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)^k + \left(1-\frac{2}{n}\right)^k}{1 - \left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)^k}. \]An insurance company believes that people can be divided into two distinct classes: those who are accident-prone and those who are not. During any given year, an accident-prone person will have an accident with probability 0.4 whereas the corresponding figure for a person who is not prone to accident is 0.2. If we assume that 30 percent of the population is accident-prone.
- (1) What is the probability that a new policyholder will have an accident within a year of purchasing a policy?
- (2) What is the conditional probability that a new policyholder will have an accident in his/her 2nd year of policy ownership, given that the policyholder has had an accident in the 1st year?
Solution:
Let \(A = \text{the policyholder is accident-prone}\).
\(A_i = \text{he or she has had an accident in } i\text{-th year}\).
Need to find: (1) \(P(A_1) = ?\) \quad (2) \(P(A_2 \mid A_1) = ?\)
(1) Using Total Probability Theorem:
\begin{align*} P(A_1) &= P(A_1 \cap A) + P(A_1 \cap A^c) \\ &= P(A_1 \mid A)P(A) + P(A_1 \mid A^c)P(A^c) \\ &= 0.4 \times \frac{3}{10} + 0.2 \times \frac{7}{10} \\ &= 0.12 + 0.14 = 0.26. \end{align*}(2)
\[ P(A_2 \mid A_1) = \frac{P(A_1 \cap A_2)}{P(A_1)} \] \begin{align*} P(A_1 \cap A_2) &= P(A_2 \cap A_1 \cap A) + P(A_2 \cap A_1 \cap A^c) \\ &= P(A_2 \mid A \cap A_1)P(A_1 \mid A)P(A) + P(A_2 \mid A^c \cap A_1)P(A_1 \mid A^c)P(A^c) \\ &= 0.4 \times 0.4 \times 0.3 + 0.2 \times 0.2 \times 0.7 \end{align*}(Assuming accidents in different years are conditionally independent given the type of person).
\[ P(A_2 \mid A_1) = \frac{0.4 \times 0.4 \times 0.3 + 0.2 \times 0.2 \times 0.7}{0.26} = \frac{0.048 + 0.028}{0.26} = \frac{0.076}{0.26} = \frac{76}{260} = \frac{19}{65}. \]A bin contains 3 types of disposable flashlights. The probability that a type 1 flashlight will give more than 100 hours of use is 0.7, with corresponding probabilities for type 2 and type 3 flashlights being 0.4 and 0.3 respectively. Suppose that 20% of the flashlights in the bin are type 1, 30% are type 2 and 50% are type 3.
- (1) What is the probability that a randomly chosen flashlight will give more than 100 hrs of use?
- (2) Given that a flashlight lasted more than 100 hrs, what is the conditional probability that it was type 1?
Solution:
\(A = \text{flashlight lasted more than 100 hours}\).
\(F_i = \text{flashlight of type } i\).
(1)
\begin{align*} P(A) &= P(A \mid F_1)P(F_1) + P(A \mid F_2)P(F_2) + P(A \mid F_3)P(F_3) \\ &= 0.7 \times 0.2 + 0.4 \times 0.3 + 0.3 \times 0.5 = 0.41 \end{align*}(2) Using Bayes Theorem:
\[ P(F_1 \mid A) = \frac{P(A \mid F_1)P(F_1)}{P(A)} = \frac{0.7 \times 0.2}{0.41} = \frac{0.14}{0.41} = \frac{14}{41} \]Reference: For more problems of this kind see "A First Course in Probability" - Sheldon Ross.
Two events \(E\) and \(F\) are said to be independent if
\[ P(E \cap F) = P(E)P(F). \]We say \(E\) and \(F\) are dependent if they are not independent.
Suppose \(E\) and \(F\) are independent then
\[ P(E \mid F) = \frac{P(E \cap F)}{P(F)} = \frac{P(E)P(F)}{P(F)} = P(E). \]- (1) If \(E\) and \(F\) are independent then \(E\) and \(F^c\) are also independent.
Proof:
\begin{align*} P(E \cap F^c) &= P(E) - P(E \cap F) \\ &= P(E) - P(E)P(F) \\ &= P(E)(1 - P(F)) \\ &= P(E)P(F^c). \end{align*} Hence \(E\) and \(F^c\) are independent. - (2) (H.W.) If \(E\) and \(F\) are independent then \(E^c\) and \(F^c\) are also independent.
\(\Omega = \{(H,H), (H,T), (T,H), (T,T)\}\).
Let \(E_1 = \text{the outcome of the first toss is } H\).
Let \(E_2 = \text{the outcome of the 2nd toss is } H\).
(a) Suppose all outcomes are equally likely. Then \(E_1\) and \(E_2\) are independent.
Proof:
Note \(E_1 = \{(H,T), (H,H)\} \implies P(E_1) = \frac{1}{2}\)
\(E_2 = \{(T,H), (H,H)\} \implies P(E_2) = \frac{1}{2}\)
\(P(E_1 \cap E_2) = P(\{(H,H)\}) = \frac{1}{4} = P(E_1) \times P(E_2)\).
Hence, independent.
(b) Suppose \(P(\{(H,H)\}) = p^2\), \(P(\{(H,T)\}) = P(\{(T,H)\}) = pq\), \(P(\{(T,T)\}) = q^2\).
For \(0 < p < 1\) & \(p+q=1\).
Then \(E_1\) and \(E_2\) are independent (H.W.).
(c) Suppose \(P(\{(H,H)\}) = \frac{1}{3}\), \(P(\{(H,T)\}) = P(\{(T,H)\}) = P(\{(T,T)\}) = \frac{2}{9}\).
Then \(E_1\) and \(E_2\) are not independent.
In this case \(P(E_1) = \frac{1}{3} + \frac{2}{9} = \frac{5}{9}\)
\(P(E_2) = \frac{5}{9}\)
\(P(E_1 \cap E_2) = \frac{1}{3} \neq \frac{5}{9} \times \frac{5}{9} = P(E_1)P(E_2)\)
Hence \(E_1\) and \(E_2\) are dependent.
(\(n\) rooms are allocated to \(n\) persons).
\(E_1 = \text{the event that 1st person gets room \#1}\).
\(E_2 = \text{the event that 2nd person gets room \#1}\).
Clearly, \(E_1\) and \(E_2\) are not independent. As
\(P(E_1) = \frac{1}{n}\), \(P(E_2) = \frac{1}{n}\), but \(P(E_1 \cap E_2) = 0\).
Assume all outcomes are equally likely.
\(E_1 = \text{the sum of two outcomes is 6}\).
\(E_2 = \text{the sum of two outcomes is 7}\).
\(F = \text{first outcome is 4}\).
Then \(E_1\) and \(F\) are dependent but \(E_2\) and \(F\) are independent.
Solution:
(a) \(E_1 = \{(w_1,w_2) \mid w_1+w_2=6, \ 1 \le w_i \le 6\} = \{(1,5), (2,4), (3,3), (4,2), (5,1)\}\)
\(P(E_1) = \frac{5}{36}\)
\(F = \{(4,1), (4,2), \dots, (4,6)\} \implies P(F) = \frac{1}{6}\)
\(P(E_1 \cap F) = P(\{(4,2)\}) = \frac{1}{36} \neq \frac{5}{36} \times \frac{1}{6} = P(E_1)P(F)\).
\(\implies E_1\) and \(F\) are not independent.
(b) \(E_2 = \{(1,6), (2,5), (3,4), (4,3), (5,2), (6,1)\}\)
\(P(E_2) = \frac{1}{6}\)
\(P(E_2 \cap F) = P(\{(4,3)\}) = \frac{1}{36} = \frac{1}{6} \times \frac{1}{6} = P(E_2) \times P(F)\)
\(\implies E_2\) and \(F\) are independent.
- (1) We say \(E_1, \dots, E_n\) are pairwise independent if, for any \(1 \le i \neq j \le n\), \[ P(E_i \cap E_j) = P(E_i)P(E_j). \]
- (2) We say \(E_1, \dots, E_n\) are mutually independent if for any \(2 \le r \le n\), \[ P(E_{i_1} \cap E_{i_2} \cap \dots \cap E_{i_r}) = P(E_{i_1}) \dots P(E_{i_r}), \quad 1 \le i_1 < i_2 < \dots < i_r \le n. \]
Remark: mutually independent \(\implies\) pairwise independent (but converse is not true).
\(\Omega = \{1,2,3,4\}\), \(P(\{i\}) = \frac{1}{4}\).
\(E_1 = \{1,2\}\), \(E_2 = \{1,3\}\), \(E_3 = \{1,4\}\).
\(P(E_k) = \frac{1}{2}\) for \(k=1,2,3\).
\(P(E_i \cap E_j) = P(\{1\}) = \frac{1}{4} = P(E_i)P(E_j)\) for \(1 \le i \neq j \le 3\).
Hence \(E_1, E_2, E_3\) are pairwise independent.
But \(P(E_1 \cap E_2 \cap E_3) = P(\{1\}) = \frac{1}{4} \neq \frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{2} = P(E_1)P(E_2)P(E_3)\).
Thus, \(E_1, E_2, E_3\) are pairwise independent but not mutually independent.
Toss a coin \(n\) times independently. Each time Head occurs with probability \(p\). What is the probability that:
- (a) at least 1 Head occurs.
- (b) exactly \(k\) Heads occur.
- (c) all are Heads.
Solution:
Let \(E_i\) be the event that Head occurs at \(i\)-th trial. \(P(E_i) = p\).
(a) \(E = \text{the event that at least 1 Head occurs} = \bigcup_{i=1}^{n} E_i\).
\begin{align*} P(E) &= 1 - P\left(\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^{n} E_i\right)^c\right) \\ &= 1 - P\left(\bigcap_{i=1}^{n} E_i^c\right) \\ &= 1 - \prod_{i=1}^{n} P(E_i^c) \quad \text{($E_i$'s are ind, so $E_i^c$'s are ind)} \\ &= 1 - (1-p)^n. \quad \text{[$P(E_i^c) = 1-p$]} \end{align*}(b) \(F = \text{the event that exactly } k \text{ Heads occur}\).
\(F = \bigcup_{1 \le i_1 < \dots < i_k \le n} E_{i_1} \dots E_{i_k} E_{i_{k+1}}^c \dots E_{i_n}^c\) (a collection of disjoint events).
(c) \(G = \text{the event that all Heads occur} = E_1 E_2 \dots E_n\).
\[ P(G) = P(E_1 \dots E_n) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} P(E_i) = p^n. \]